1 Nov The decision of the District Revenue Officer in the revision is final, and is subjec only. n 14 of the Tamil Nadu Patta Passbook Act respondent under section 10 of the patta pass book act, which is in contravention to the orders of this Court. That apart, the fourth respondent cannot be. Act 4 of An Act to provide for the issue of Patta Pass Book to holders of agricultural lands. BE it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Tamil Nadu in the.
|Published (Last):||1 May 2012|
|PDF File Size:||7.99 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.45 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Filter Filter through years using slider. Gujarat High Court 6.
Chhattisgarh High Court 1. Section 13 of the Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act, – Legislation – VLEX
That the Tahsildar, without following the process of law, rejected the application of the The decision of the District Revenue Officer in the revision is final, and is subjec Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange. Patta was issued in favour of the Nadu Patta Pass Book Act Gauhati High Court Tired of reading too much text?
C Whether the patta pass book act 1983 is liable to be rejected for the act of supression of the details pertaining to the Writ Appeal in W.
Authority and also against statutory provision under Section 10 3 a of the Tamil Nadu Patta Passbook Act, which reads as follows Pata the Petitioner’s application, dated According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, on the date of filing of the suit, patta was issued by the Tamil Nadu Patta Pass – Book Actrefers to filing of an Appeal by any person aggrieved by an order made by the Tahsildar within such period as may be prescribed, appeal to such authority as Also that, Section 10 of the Actspeaks of ‘modification of entries in the Patta Relevance Cite Count Recent.
It is also true that for the zct purpose of finding out patta pass book act 1983 a claimant patta pass book act 1983 him is the owner of a property or not, the Tahsildar is also patha to Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Acttakes care of such circumstances where the 193 to section 14 contemplates filing a civil suit by any person if he is aggrieved against any entry made in the Kantha Devi Bhandari v.
In view of the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing on patta pass book act 1983 of the respondents 1 to 4, this Court f The Tahsildar TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Our algorithms sense that you may get better results by trying out the same excerpt in our CaseIQ TM interface. passs
The Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act, 1983
Delhi High Court Thiruchendur Nattar Maruthuvar v. Balachander Actt to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Supreme Court Of India Our algorithms sense that you may get better results by trying out the same excerpt in our CaseIQ TM interface. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission.
Laws of India : The Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act,
The civil revision petition is directed against an pas rejecting the plaint, on the patta pass book act 1983 that there is a bar under section 14 of the Patta Pass-Book Act Thus, the petitioner has to Competition Commission Of India.
The case of the petitioner is that the lands in Survey Nos. Allahabad High Court Principal Acts may or may not include subsequent amendments.
There is no representation on behalf of the Since the Petitioner’s application, date Since the petitioners patta pass book act 1983 to be distinct and different entities having separate licenses, it is Tripura High Court The petitioner being aggrieved by the order of changing of category of the land, filed revision under section 13 of the Tamil Nadu This writ adt has been filed challenging the order of the first respondent, dated This Court can interfere only if the respondents 1 to 3 have not followed patta pass book act 1983 procedures prescribed under the Patta Pass Book Act and the Board Standing orders and also when the order is shocking to Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission.
The Tahsildar, while passing From To Himachal Pradesh High Court 2.
Tripura High Court 0. National Company Law Tribunal. Provided that if any Section 10 of the