A Rulebook for Arguments has ratings and reviews. Kirstine said: If you want to be good at arguing, this book is for you. I read it all in one. Short Arguments: Some General Rules Arguments begin by marshaling reasons and organizing them in a clear and fair way. Chapter I offers general rules for. A Rulebook for Arguments by Anthony Weston – book review By Eko Rustamaji ( ) Description A Rulebook for Arguments was written by Anthony.
|Published (Last):||28 February 2014|
|PDF File Size:||16.73 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.90 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Log In Sign Up. Published January 1st by Hackett Publishing Company first published Its brevity is one aspect of its value. I’ve tried to find a book that does include them and this was, in the end, the most likely candidate to cover this topic, so I’m a tad disappointed.
Remember me on this computer. I’m not in a position to argue For example, arguments by analogy, deductive arguments, and the last discussion or lesson is composing an argumentative essay which is divided by three sub chapters, they are composing an argumentative essay A, composing an argumentative essay B, and composing an argumentative essay C.
Enter the email address you signed up with and we’ll email you a reset link. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Arguments and debates might actually be productive if pe I took some notes. Criticisms and suggestions, as always, are welcome. The mistake is to have nothing else.
This 85pg book accomplished much of its aim: Interestingly, I would contest the logic of westoh of the examples that Weston uses in this book. I understand that it’s made to be a simple rulebook, but since it’s over 80 pages long, I wasn’t expecting it to be so simple.
A Rulebook for Arguments
A Theory of Legal Reasoning. Perhaps of good use for young students. The chapters from this book is complete starting from the easy material to the difficult material supported by the fallacies and appendix provided in last page of the book. I took some notes. If you’re looking for a very basic overview of argumentation and logic, then it’s worth having.
It is concise, easy to read and full of concrete examples to apply and support the countless tips and advices in the book. The sixth chapter is Deductive Arguments. There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Also, and this is much rulebokk, he keeps bringing in religious examples, so the issue is the same. I read arfuments all in one go, and that’s a bit counter-productive, seeing as you won’t be able to remember all of it unless you’re crazy smart, in which case, you probably don’t need this book.
Non-fiction Review- A Rulebook For Arguments by Anthony Weston | Eko Rustamaji –
Different sections and argument types are divided so that they are in a logical order and easy to find from one place which makes this book easy to use and navigate. It can be used as a reference for the students who want to improve their argumentation skill because this book contains the tips in composing short arguments until composing an argumentative essay. Therefore, argument is of extreme importance to preachers.
Problems with Teaching the Ad Hominem Fallacy. The sob stories ‘appealing to pity as an argument for special treatment. This is a rulebook as the title suggests, but it is concise and readable. Probably the best introduction to the subject on the market.
The checklist itself is quite solid. The fifth chapter is Arguments about Causes. The best part was probably the voucher example use A very short book, full of obvious statements. No one outgrows its forty-five timeless rules, all explained and illustrated with vivid examples.
A Rulebook for Arguments consists of 87 pages and 10 chapters.
From starting with premises, testing them, considering multiple perspectives, different types of evidence, and logic.
Although the language used is highly academic, but it can be understood easily, especially for the university students who are studying how to make a good arguments in English.
Second part of the book is arguuments long arguments. The third chapter is Arguments by Analogy.
Account Options Sign in. It’s an ok resource to have, has the most important information needed and it’s quite concise. That is how you will convince others: Arguments and debates might actually be productive if people abided by the rules presented in this rulebook. Jul 23, Vel Veeter rated it liked it Shelves: Unlike most textbooks on ar Updated examples, streamlined text, and the chapter on definition reworked in a rule-based format strengthen this already strong volume.
To ask other readers questions about A Rulebook for Argumentsplease sign up. However, the ways to control gesture does not explain in the book. It may be a good book if you know nothing about logic or argumentation, but for most people, I think it’s too simpl It’s an ok resource to have, has the most important information needed and it’s quite concise. In this chapter, there are some explanations, such as sources should be cited, and seek informed sources.
Jul 16, Emily rated it liked it Shelves: My library Help Advanced Book Search.
The book basically explains what’s acceptable in an argument and what’s not and how that argument should be westton. He cites sources for some of his claims so it just seems lazy, ignorant or arrogant to not cite sources for all of his claims as if the reader should take as fact his opinion on certain current issues breaking his own Rule This is no end-all discussions This 85pg book accomplished much of its aim: Metaphilosophical Criteria for Worldview Comparison.