12 Apr I will then offer a narrative of how I think the conventional notion of ‘doing history’ was challenged by Keith Jenkins. I will then somewhat more. But finding an answer to the question ‘What is history?’ is a task few feel equipped to Rethinking History. Front Cover · Keith Jenkins. Routledge, Dec 16 , Polemical in tone, the book argues against a skills-based approach to history in Keith Jenkins argues that history must abandon the search for objective truth.
|Published (Last):||16 July 2010|
|PDF File Size:||14.82 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.87 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Read more Read less. Jenkins classic text about doing history in the postmodern world is, as the many endorsements in the front pages attest, valuable for its remarkable clarity in setting out why it matters that we give up our common sense notion of history and think seriously about the implications of post-modern and post-structural theory for doing historical work. Psychology Press- History – 99 pages. It merely suggests that historians are not very logical. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
In science we learn more and more about the world around keith jenkins rethinking history, but it seems unlikely we will ever have all the answers. These chapters are followed by a Notes section, containing mostly references to other books or articles. Keith jenkins rethinking history 25, LunaBel rated it liked it Shelves: We are all Buddhists now!
Keith Jenkins Retrospective | Reviews in History
What are the critical skills you need to begin to make sense of the past? Dec 02, Cyndie rated it liked it Recommended to Cyndie by: Paperbackpages.
The differences in studying one vs. A very entertaining read. This book unlocks the great wisdom of stoicism in jenkns simple way. What histor divides the two points of view, then, is not only their attitude keith jenkins rethinking history belief in the accessibility of the past, but also their attitude to belief in the capacity of language to describe that past.
For, keith jenkins rethinking history he remarks in his introduction, history depends not on the past for its current existence, but on its present representers historians and their representations. History then is a sort of self-knowledge, constructed biologically from a well-stocked brain, in ways that we do not yet fully understand.
When it was first published it infuriated many in the history business, but also fascinated others. Hayden White argues that relativism is desirable because is serves as the basis for “social toleration and the positive recognition of differences” page Keith jenkins rethinking history certainly won’t accept all of his positions, but I’m glad I read the book.
The perfect introduction to this thought-provoking area, Jenkins’ clear and concise prose guides readers through the controversies and debates that surround historical thinking at the present time, providing them with the means to make their own discoveries. Keith Jenkins’ book is the perfect introduction. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. He sets about to undermine the entire approach adopted by most western academic keith jenkins rethinking history to the subject, especially through his use of postmodernism a word which still makes many history professors shudder.
From the origin of the universe to the emergence of humans and what keith jenkins rethinking history future might bring, David Christian boldly reframes our place in the cosmos.
The perfect introduction to this thought-provoking area, Jenkins’ clear and concise prose guide History means many things to many people. I really think post-modernism could have been used to greater effect, as I’m not exactly one to shudder away from newer conc This was a review I really wanted to hold off before Keith jenkins rethinking history could articulate this properly.
Common terms and phrases academic accounts actually answer arguably argued argument Barthes basic bias Blackwell Cambridge centre certaintist concepts constructed context course criticism culture debates developed Discourse of History dominant E.
A short but dense read on what “history” as catalogued by historians really is and the flaws in history. But because people are always ideologically motivated and positioned in the present, authoring an objectively true account of the past is impossible because facts must be selected in an infinitely rich and inexhaustible world, making those facts which come keith jenkins rethinking history be selected ideologically-laden.
Jan 11, Michelle Chan rated it it was amazing. The authors of these argued variously:.
One healthy dose of Buckley’s Medicine. Short and interesting read. Evans, In Defense of HistoryLondon, Like Hayden White keith jenkins rethinking history other “postmodern” historiographers, Jenkins believes that any historian’s output should be seen as a story. The book involves a lot of deconstructionist ideas but without much depth to them since it’s waaaay beyond the scopebut it has a great bibliography and encourages the reader to keep a critical eye on all of the ideas so that they keith jenkins rethinking history decide for themselves what to accept and adopt.
There are plenty of methodologies available to historians but all are self-referencing, but which one to choose? The most dishonest are those histories which fethinking they have no point of view.
According to Jenkins, during his tenure at University College Chichester, he noticed that students lacked interest in questions such as “what is history? Instead, historians wield a dominant sway over the reading of evidence that can be understood rethinkiny ways. Such, it seems, is the ultimate purpose of Refiguring History. Great book that keith jenkins rethinking history the reader plenty to think about.
Literature and philosophy, but less so history, have their own well-developed theories.