pdf -il-ruolo-del-discorso-psicoanalitico-nel-trattamento-delle-nuove- T+ benchmarking-best-. .. http://testnet0. T+ io/ :// .. T+ .
|Published (Last):||9 February 2013|
|PDF File Size:||1.46 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.3 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
State parties should undertake a comprehensive review of the laws on accessibility in order to identify, monitor and address gaps in legislation and its implementation “. The UN Convention has been ratified by 25 Member States while the remaining three Member States are finalising amkinistrazione.filetype ratification process.
Thirdly, barriers to trade may also arise because of a lack of information concerning the goods and services which are potentially available, or the accessibility requirements to which goods or services must conform. This divergence is driven either by lack of EU coordination of which goods and services should be accessible or, when EU law or International agreements prescribes at a general level that certain goods or services need to be accessible for instance the UN Convention or the EU public procurement rulesit does not provide detailed rules on which accessibility requirements would actually apply.
This typically results in national markets remaining national, and established national suppliers of goods and services being protected from new entry by competitors from other countries.
EUR-Lex – SC – EN – EUR-Lex
Accessibility is often benchmarkig as a physical phbblica and therefore as an obligation to carry out costly alterations to the built environment: State parties should also ensure that all newly procured goods and other services are fully accessible for persons with disabilities. Nature and scale of the problem. Finally the sectors covered by this impact assessment may be subject to other existing EU legislation dealing with other issues like protection of health, environmental protection or energy consumption since essential requirements of different directives need to be applied simultaneously in order to cover all relevant public interests Its provisions would be carefully tailored not to overlap benchmarkin rules of the existing consumer rights legislation and to take them into account.
Furthermore, it is reported that there is also a lack of online information about the accessibility of accommodation establishments. Terminal equipment can be subdivided into fixed and mobile phones.
The calculation of the costs in the baseline scenario are based on a set of basic assumptions, including market volume, proportion of cross-border trade and the additional costs of developing accessible goods and services.
A person using real time text or SMS in one country for that purpose is not guaranteed the use of that technical solution in another country.
To design an objective list, a step by step approach 25 has been undertaken. Nevertheless, the scope and detailed level of coverage varies strongly across countries.
According to feedback from consumers, there seem to be insufficient accessible mainstream goods and services on the EU market The Commission reiterated its commitment to accessibility in its work programme 23 that stated: Similarly the new Structural Fund Regulations do not specify what accessibility means. In other cases, EU legislation addresses only the pugblica of persons with disabilities with a focus on a specific area focusing on an assistive approach.
As regards computers, binding technical accessibility requirements can be identified in two EU Member States: In contrast, the European Lift Association refers to the positive effect that common rules on accessibility have had in Europe to dismantle market barriers: This would ensure the attainment of the objectives of the initiative without going beyond what is necessary for that purpose.
The final list of amministraziobe.filetype and services reflects the outcome of the criteria applied and the evidence that was gathered. In the responses to the public consultation businesses referred to additional costs for the adaptation of products, as well as for the time needed to understand the different legislative requirements in the Member States.
EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
These requirements differ in scope and technical rules, those technical differences might limit the correct use of accessibility features when broadcasting the service outside the Member State.
The rules of this EU initiative would only complement that legislation. Drawing on amministrazione.fieltype various consultations and surveys carried out with interested parties, it emerges that the current patchwork of fragmented accessibility requirements for the priority goods and services nepla Member States results in barriers to the proper functioning of the internal market for accessible goods and services. This intended EU proposal on improving the pubbliva of the internal market, by requiring private sector websites in some sectors to be accessible would have a different scope which will not overlap with that of the current proposal.
These countries are likely to develop amministrazion.filetype that may not be fully aligned with already existing requirements and create further differences regarding the user interface, design and physical characteristics. As a result, architectural designs that are exported to other countries have to be adapted to meet national codes and regulations, and consequently no single, standard design can be put to use across Europe.
Making eBooks accessible includes mark-up of eBook as per its semantics headings, pages, footnotes etc. How will businesses, SMEs and micro-enterprises be affected?
The current accessibility problems related to these three elements are described in the sections above on architect services, private sector websites, and self-service terminals.
In addition, it is expected that more Member States will adopt accessibility requirements for private sector services websites based on their obligations under the UN Convention. In the future, the divergence in national accessibility requirements in the EU is expected to increase.
The diversity of the regulatory framework, where some Member States have complex national rules regulating accessibility, whereas others do not have any binding measures, results in economic disadvantages for those economic operators whose goods and services must fulfil those accessibility requirements, for example to sell to public authorities of the Member State of origin.
In some cases the initiative could also entail a limited restriction to the exercise of those rights with the adoption of new rules in some Member States. Firstly, there is a noticeable trend to include social aspects, including accessibility requirements, in national plans on strategic use of public procurement.
Industry feedback has been supportive, for example in the cases of the lifts and the rail sectors, in their response to the European Accessibility Act as to the effect of enlarging and opening EU wide markets and providing a competitive edge