Friends of PDF

all our visitors are our friends. we love them all. we want them to find and download pdf files from our website. we do our best to satisfy them. and they share our website on their facebook walls.




ASTM D4157 PDF

Weight: g/Im. Product End Use: Upholstery. Identification. Tested For: Bente Ellingsoe, Quality Department. Key Test: ASTM D/ACT K. Gabriel A/S. ASTM DAbrasion Test by Oscillatory – Download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online. ASTM D* Wyzenbeek (Oscillatory Cylinder). The ASTM D is a test of the American Society of Testing and Materials. A Wyzenbeek machine is.

Author: Zugul Arashigal
Country: Papua New Guinea
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Love
Published (Last): 22 October 2006
Pages: 471
PDF File Size: 15.73 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.8 Mb
ISBN: 406-8-29068-931-6
Downloads: 60627
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gardarr

Within the text, the inch-pound units are shown in parentheses. Wyzenbeek — New Test Video View: It is not surprising, therefore, to find that there are many different types of abrasion testing machines, abradants, testing conditions, testing procedures, methods of evaluation of abrasion resistance, and interpretation of results.

This test can also increase the uniformity of the abrading action by washing away abrasion debris and preventing the build up of broken fibers that can interfere with the proper progression of the tests. Wyzenbeek — New Test Video. Collectively, these considerations will facilitate your selection of the most appropriate fabric for asstm project. Specific instances have been described.

My go to reference on the subject is the Association for Contract Textiles. With permanent abradants that use hardened metal or equivalent surfaces, it is assumed that the abradant will not change appreciably in a specific series of tests, but obviously similar abradants used in different laboratories will not likely change at the same rate due to differences in usage.

Understanding Abrasion Testing – Alendel Fabrics Ltd.

Link to Active This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard. The results obtained from the use of this instrument assist in evaluating these factors relative to the wear asm of the final textile product in specific end uses. ACT studies indicate that results of multiple abrasion tests performed on some woven fabric structures may vary significantly — as much as 60 percent or more.

For more information please refer to abrasion white papers on the ACT website. Accordingly, specifiers should consider the following qualifiers when qstm double rub ratings: Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the d457. If bias is found, either its cause must be found and corrected, or future test results must be adjusted in consideration of the known bias.

The relationship varies with different end uses, and different factors may be necessary in any calculation of predicted durability from specific abrasion data.

Understanding Abrasion Testing

A Wyzenbeek asym is used for this test allowing samples of the test fabric to be pulled tight in a frame and held stationary. Wyzenbeek results abovedouble rubs have not been shown to be an indicator of increased lifespan. Number of cycles determines abrasion rating. Four options for evaluation are included: Experience has shown in many instances, that relative results obtained with this instrument when used on a series of fabrics, agreed with those obtained based upon performance in end d4175.

Other fabrics with established test values may be used for this purpose. This test method may not be usable for some fabric constructions.

As a minimum, test samples that are as homogeneous as possible, drawn from the material from which the disparate test results were obtained, and randomly assigned in equal numbers to each asm for testing.

The resistance to abrasion is affected by many factors that include the inherent mechanical properties of the fibers; the dimensions of the fibers; the structure of the yarns; the construction of the fabrics; the type, kind, amount of treatment added to the fibers, yarns or fabric; the nature of the abradant; the tension on the specimen; the pressure between the specimen and the abradant; and the dimensional changes in the specimen.

In general, they should not be relied upon for prediction of actual wear-life in specific end uses unless there are data showing the specific relationship between laboratory abrasion tests and actual wear in the intended end-use.

ASTM D – 08() Standard Guide for Abrasion Resistance of Textile Fabrics (Uniform Abrasion)

Permanent abradants may also change due to pick up of finishing or other material from test fabrics and must accordingly be cleaned at frequent intervals. Association of Contact Textiles Website.

In an effort to bring asym clarity to the appropriate consideration of double rub numbers, as of April 1,textile companies and furniture manufacturers that use the ACT certification mark for abrasion on their samples will now include the following statement whenever publishing test results in excess ofdouble rubs: Studies have shown that Wyzenbeek test results on the same fabric can and do vary significantly from test to test.

Link to Active This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard.

The test results from the two laboratories should be compared using a statistical test for unpaired data, at a probability level chosen prior to the testing series.

Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard.

Laboratory tests may be reliable as an indication of relative end-use performance in wstm where astmm difference in abrasion resistance of various materials is large, but they should not be relied upon where differences in laboratory test findings are small.

The measurement of the relative amount of abrasion may also be affected by the method of evaluation and may be influenced by the judgment of the operator. Historical Version s – view previous versions of standard. In fact, Wyzenbeek results abovedouble rubs have not been shown to be an indicator of increased fabric lifespan. Wire screen or wire mesh is used as an abradant when the test specimen is more abrasive than d1457 cotton duck.

For example, a predetermined number of abrasion cycles at specified test conditions may be performed on a series of specimens, which are then subjected to a strength or barrier performance test.

Other procedures for measuring the abrasion resistance of textile fabrics are given in: A fabric with twice the number of abrasion cycles does not indicate double the service life.